UPDATE: Megyn Kelly is under fire after controversial comments made on her SiriusXM show regarding Jeffrey Epstein‘s actions. During the broadcast on October 24, 2023, she suggested that Epstein should not be labeled a “pedophile,” insisting instead that he preferred “very young teen types,” particularly 15-year-old girls.
Kelly claimed an unnamed source “very, very close to the case” informed her that Epstein “liked the barely legal type” rather than prepubescent children. She described this preference as “disgusting” but argued it warranted reevaluation of the label “pedophile.”
Her remarks sparked immediate backlash, with critics accusing her of downplaying the severity of Epstein’s actions. Notably, The Daily Show host Josh Johnson reacted sharply, questioning, “How the hell was Megyn Kelly ever an attorney?” He further mocked her comments as a troubling form of “diet pedophilia.”
Johnson stated, “Everyone knows there is a big difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old. But everyone also knows there is never a good reason to be talking about that difference.” His response encapsulated widespread outrage on social media, where users condemned Kelly for minimizing sexual abuse.
Critics, including advocates for survivors, emphasized that Epstein’s long history of coercion and trafficking involved minors who could not legally consent, regardless of their age. Many believe Kelly’s comments could further harm survivors by reframing Epstein’s crimes as less severe.
Kelly also cast doubt on statements made by former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who claimed Epstein possessed thousands of graphic videos involving minors. “I once believed Epstein was an actual pedophile,” Kelly stated, indicating a shift in her perspective influenced by skepticism of Bondi’s reporting.
As the backlash continues to grow, Kelly has yet to issue a further response to the outcry. This controversy has reignited discussions surrounding the language used when addressing child sexual abuse and the implications it carries for survivors.
The episode serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in addressing sensitive topics surrounding sexual exploitation and the need for responsible discourse. Critics are urging for a more nuanced understanding of consent and the legal definitions of abuse.
This story is still developing, and many are watching closely to see how Kelly and her audience will respond to the mounting criticism.
